· 6/13/2023
State of Missouri v. John A. Hamby
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
- explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
- explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
- explaining that the context of a statute includes related statutes
- “The context of a statute includes other provisions of the same statute and related statutes, as well as the preexisting common law and the statutory frame- work within which the statute was enacted.” (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.)
- “[W]hen construing a stat- ute to determine the intent of the legislature, this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that cre- ates redundancy in the way that the statute is read.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilson, C.J., Russell, Fischer and Ransom, JJ., concur; Breckenridge, J., dissents in separate opinion filed; Draper, J., concurs in opinion of Breckenridge, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.