State of Missouri v. Derek T. Hubbard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim of abandonment based on movant's contention that postconviction counsel's amended motion failed to raise other claims known to movant \is not a claim that is cognizable in Missouri courts\
• stating that appointed counsel may have abandoned an indigent post-conviction movant (1) when “post- conviction counsel takes no action on movant’s behalf with respect to filing an amended motion” or (2
• “[N]either this Court nor the federal courts have held that this Sixth Amendment right [to counsel] extends to the post-conviction process.”
• \Such third-party interference can also constitute a basis for allowing the filing of a new motion for post- conviction relief by the movant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).