Skip to main content
· 2/24/2015

State of Missouri v. Andrew Luke Lemasters

Citations

  • 456 S.W.3d 416
  • 2015 Mo. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a nunc pro tunc order was appropriate where the written judgment did not accurately reflect what happened during a trial and subsequent sentencing
  • holding that a nunc pro tunc order was appropriate where the written judgment did not accurately reflect what happened during a trial and subsequent sentencing
  • “It is the court’s duty to enforce the mandatory time limits and the resulting complete waiver in the post-conviction rules[.]”
  • applying appearance of impropriety standard to an assistant prosecuting attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Paul C. Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.