Skip to main content
· 4/2/2014

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TENA D. CADY

Citations

  • 425 S.W.3d 234
  • 2014 WL 1328278
  • 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, “Because the NPLEX records are not testimonial in nature, Defendant’s right of confrontation was not violated, and the trial court did not err in admitting the NPLEX records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Burrell, Sheffield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.