Skip to main content
· 5/13/2024

State of Minnesota v. Tyler Gregory Opatz

Syllabus

Appellant Tyler Gregory Opatz challenges his convictions of second-degree assault and threats of violence, arguing that insufficient evidence supports the convictions because respondent State of Minnesota failed to prove the intent element of both offenses. Because the state presented sufficient evidence of Opatz's intent, we affirm.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.