Skip to main content
· 6/10/2024

State of Minnesota v. Samuel Alejondro Torrez

Syllabus

At a trial for refusal to submit to chemical testing pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2(2) (2018), the state does not have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that law enforcement had probable cause to believe the defendant was driving while impaired if there was a valid search warrant for a blood or urine test supported by probable cause. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.