State of Minnesota v. Said Sharif Maye
Citations
- 6 N.W.3d 103
Syllabus
1. The district court abused its discretion by allowing the admission of evidence on direct examination of anonymous, threatening phone calls a witness received before trial when the minimal probative value of the threat evidence was substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice that its admission posed to the defendant. 1 2. Because the defendant has not demonstrated a reasonable possibility that the admission of evidence on direct examination of anonymous, threatening phone calls a witness received before trial significantly impacted the jury's verdict, the defendant is not entitled to a new trial. Affirmed.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.