State of Minnesota v. Raymont Michael Redmond

Syllabus

In this appeal from the final judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that the district court erred by allowing the state to introduce evidence of the victim's out-of-court statements and by failing to give a specific unanimity instruction to the jury. Appellant also argues in a pro se supplemental brief that the jury was \tainted\ by two evidentiary issues. Because we discern no plain error by the district court and because appellant's pro se argument does not warrant relief, we affirm.