State of Minnesota v. Lyndon Akeem Wiggins
Syllabus
1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant's pretrial motion to suppress the cell-site location information for his cell phone because the facts alleged in the warrant application established probable cause to search the cell-site location information records of the defendant's cell phone carrier. 2. The district court abused its discretion by giving erroneous jury instructions on accomplice liability, and the error was not harmless because it cannot be said beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had no significant impact on the verdict. Reversed and remanded.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.