Skip to main content
· 4/22/2024

State of Minnesota v. James Lockhart Lang

Syllabus

Appellant challenges his conviction for aiding and abetting third-degree assault, arguing that the postconviction court abused its discretion by denying his request for relief based on false and newly discovered evidence. Alternatively, appellant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.