Skip to main content
· 5/28/2024

State of Minnesota v. Curt Matthew Craven

Syllabus

On appeal from his convictions of driving while impaired (DWI) and fleeing police in a motor vehicle, appellant argues that his convictions must be reversed because the district court failed to obtain a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of counsel from him, and erroneously deemed his right to counsel waived by dilatory conduct. Because we agree, we reverse and remand.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.