State of Minnesota v. Brian Russell Lueck

Syllabus

1. When a warrant authorizes one type of chemical test—either blood or urine—a person's refusal to submit to that specific test, and not another, is required to sustain a conviction for test refusal under Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.20, subd. 2(2), and 171.177, subd. 2. 2. A test refusal conviction based on refusal of a warranted chemical test does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Affirmed.