State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dirrell Hugh

Syllabus

Appellant Antonio Dirrell Hugh challenges his conviction, following a jury trial, for unlawful possession of a firearm. He argues that respondent State of Minnesota failed to satisfy its burden of proving his guilt at trial because the evidence that he possessed a gun was entirely circumstantial and consistent with his innocence. We conclude that the trial evidence was sufficient to establish Hugh's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and we affirm.