Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the motor use restrictions of section 4 of the BWCA Wilderness Act are \part of an elaborate system of regulation [Congress] considered necessary to preserve the BWCAW as a wilderness\
• holding the motor use restrictions of section 4 of the BWCA Wilderness Act are “part of an elaborate system of regulation [Congress] considered necessary to preserve the BWCAW as a wilderness”
• state statute granting federal government right of first refusal not a taking even if some diminution in value results
• statute granting federal government right of first refusal not a taking even if some diminution in value results
• “Many statutes * * * require administrative and judicial construction to clarify specific language. Such statutes are not unconstitutionally vague”
• “Many statutes * * * require administrative and judicial construction to clarify specific language. Such statutes are not unconstitutionally vague”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).