State of Maine v. Jessee Mackin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor '\clearly elected ... the criminal acts associated with the two counts during its closing arguments'\
• “Where the essential purpose of a constitutional protection can be satisfied in a collateral proceeding without a per se prejudice rule, such a rule should not be adopted.” (citing St. Pierre, 118 Wn.2d at 328-29)
• prosecutor “ ‘clearly elected ... the criminal acts associated with the two counts during its closing arguments’ ” (quoting State v. Delgado, noted at 139 Wn. App. 1068, 2007 WL 2085344, at , 2007 Wash. App. LEXIS 2098, at )
• prosecutor “‘clearly elected . . . the criminal acts associated with the two counts during its closing arguments’”. . . , with State v. Williams, 136 Wn. App. 486, 497, 150 P.3d 111 (2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).