State of Louisiana v. Rashad W. Estem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prosecutor’s statements, although improper, were curable and did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial
• concluding that prosecutor’s statements, although improper, were curable and did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial
• explaining that “prosecutorial state- ments that were improper but curable are not an appropriate subject of plain-error review, because, in such circumstances, the defendant was not denied a fair trial” (emphasis omitted)
• explaining that “prosecutorial state- ments that were improper but curable are not an appropriate subject of plain-error review, because, in such circumstances, the defendant was not denied a fair trial” (emphasis omitted)
• explaining that “prosecutorial statements that were improper but curable are not an appropriate subject of plain-error review, because, in such circumstances, the defen- dant was not denied a fair trial” (emphasis in original)
• explaining that “prosecutorial statements that were improper but curable are not an appropriate subject of plain- error review, because, in such circumstances, the defendant was not denied a fair trial” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).