State of Louisiana v. Johnny E. Jefferson Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is “not obvious and is reasonably in dispute whether the trial court violated ORS 426.100(1)(c) in failing to advise appellant of a possible firearm prohibition order.”
• concluding that it is “not obvious and is reasonably in dispute whether the trial court violated ORS 426.100(1)(c) in failing to advise appellant of a possible firearm prohibition order”
• holding in plain-error posture that it was not “obvious” that an appellant must be advised of the potential for a firearm prohibition as a possible result of the proceeding under ORS 426.100(1)(c)
• “An error that is not obvious or that is reasonably in dispute is not a plain error and is therefore not reviewable by this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).