State of Iowa v. Thomas C. Casper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that specific findings were not required in a different juvenile sentencing context
• holding that a sentence within statutory limits is not subject to this Court’s review unless “the facts establish a violation of a specific constitutional right during sentencing” (quoting Howard v. State, 820 So. 2d 337, 339–40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002))
• rejecting defendant’s argument that his prior juvenile dispositions rendered without a jury trial should not be included on his scoresheet when calculating the lowest permissible prison sentence
• rejecting defendant’s argument that his prior juvenile dispositions rendered without a jury trial should not be included on his score-sheet when calculating the lowest permissible prison sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).