State of Iowa v. Shawn Eric Pattison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, since Apprendi, the Court has “repeatedly rejected efforts to dodge the demands of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by the simple expedient of relabeling a criminal prosecution a sentencing enhancement” (quotation marks omitted)
• noting that, since Apprendi, the Court has “repeatedly rejected efforts to dodge the demands of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by the simple expedient of relabeling a criminal prosecution a sentencing enhancement” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Finding no basis in the original understanding of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments for McMillan and Harris [v. United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002)], the [Alleyne] Court expressly overruled those decisions . . . .”
• “[F]ounding-era prosecutions traditionally ended at final judgment,” and “at that time, . . . questions of guilt and punishment both were resolved in a single proceeding subject to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment’s demands.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Supervised release is part of the overall sentence.”
• considering the constitutionality of section 3583(k)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).