State of Iowa v. Lucious Lee Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government interests prohibiting the possession of child pornography are much stronger than those supporting the prohibition of pornography generally
• holding new construction of statute may be applied to conduct occurring prior to construction only where defendant has fair warning of new application
• describing Buckley as a “case where a law was construed to avoid potential overbreadth problems”
• judicial rewriting of statutes would derogate Congress' \incentive to draft a narrowly tailored law in the first place\
• “The pornography’s continued existence causes the child victims continuing harm by haunting the children for years to come.”
• “[I]t is now difficult, if not impossible, to solve the child pornography problem by only attacking production and distribution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).