State of Iowa v. Justin Hundley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appeal period began to run from the date on which the orders denying Commonwealth’s motions to vacate nolle prosequis were entered the trial court docket, and not from the date the trial court orally denied the motions
• noting that Rule 600 “provides for dismissal of charges only in cases in which the defendant has not been brought to trial within the term of the adjusted run date, after subtracting all excludable and excusable time.”
• noting that Rule 600 “provides for dismissal of charges only in cases in which the defendant has not been brought to trial within the term of the adjusted run date, after - 11 - J. S69024/16 subtracting all excludable and excusable time.”
• “Excusable delay is delay that occurs as a result of circumstances beyond the Commonwealth’s control and despite its due diligence.”
• “A nolle prosequi may be lifted ‘at any time in the future,’ on appropriate motion, to revive the original charges.”
• “Excusable delay is delay that occurs as a result of circumstances beyond the Commonwealth’s control and despite its due diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).