State of Iowa v. Jason Ray Ball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant could rely on Descamps to prove his Johnson claim because Descamps \is not an independent claim that is itself subject to the gatekeeping requirements\
• applying Descamps retroactively to evaluate a Johnson claim raised in a second or successive § 2255 motion
• allowing defendant to rely on Descamps to prove claim under Johnson because Descamps \is not an independent claim that is itself subject to the gatekeeping requirements\
• granting leave to file second or successive petition where it was “unclear from the record which clause of the ACCA the district court employed when it concluded that [the defendant’s] prior burglary conviction qualified as a predicate' offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).