State of Iowa v. Jack Raymond Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoner’s “fail[ure] to comply with the § 3582(c)(1)(A) administrative exhaustion requirement” precluded relief
• Finding that the “exceptions to mandatory claim-processing rules [of] waiver or forfeiture” did not apply where the “government timely objected to [the petitioner’s] failure to exhaust at every available opportunity.”
• Finding that the “exceptions to mandatory claim-processing rules [of] waiver or forfeiture” did not apply where the “government timely objected to [the petitioner’s] failure to exhaust at every available opportunity.”
• explaining that the BOP decides which inmates are eligible for home confinement
• holding that the exhaustion requirement is nonjurisdictional
• affirming a district court’s denial without prejudice of a motion for compassionate release when the defendant filed the motion ten days after submitting a request to the warden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).