State of Iowa v. Denise Susanna O'Brien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that speculative theory of possible injury insufficient to establish injury in fact under Article III's case or controversy requirement
• holding that while the risk of future injury may be founded on a likely and credible chain of events, the injury must be “certainly impending.”
• holding that speculative theory of possible injury insufficient to establish injury in fact under Article Ill’s case or controversy requirement
• concluding that “[i]t is just not possible for a litigant to prove in advance that the judicial system will lead to any particular result in his case”
• holding that the petitioner lacked standing to challenge the death sentence of another prisoner, even though he claimed Arkansas had a system of “comparative review in death penalty cases”
• holding that a third party does not have \standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).