Skip to main content
· 8/30/2023

State of Iowa v. Dashaun Avery Redmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that whether a suggestive identification “resulted in such unfairness that it infringed [the defendant’s] right to due process of law” is “open to all persons to allege and prove”
  • concluding that whether a suggestive identification “resulted in such unfairness that it infringed [the defend- ant’s] right to due process of law” is “open to all persons to allege and prove”
  • recognizing that “[t]he practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, and not as part of a line-up, has been widely condemned”
  • holding that “a claimed violation of due process of law in the conduct of a [showup] confrontation depends on the totality of the circumstances surrounding it”
  • holding that event occurring prior to the initiation of criminal proceedings may only be challenged on due process grounds, which is independent of any right to counsel claim
  • holding that based on the totality of the circumstances, confrontation of the accused for identification purposes may infringe upon due process rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.