State of Iowa v. Chad Alan Stechcon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exhaustion expressly waived when the State admitted in its answer to the federal habeas petition that the prisoner had “sufficiently exhausted his state remedies”
• holding exhaustion expressly waived when the State admitted in its answer to the federal habeas petition that the prisoner had “sufficiently exhausted his state remedies”
• holding exhaustion expressly waived when the State admitted in its answer to the federal habeas petition that the prisoner had “sufficiently exhausted his state remedies”
• holding exhaustion expressly waived when the State admitted in its answer to the federal habeas petition that the prisoner had “sufficiently exhausted his state remedies”
• finding that the state waived its exhaustion argument when it stated that the petitioner “ha[d] sufficiently exhausted his state remedies as required”
• “[T]o prohibit our collateral review the state court must have expressly relied on the procedural bar as a basis for disposing of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).