State of Iowa v. Brandon Dewielde Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an injunction “is overbroad if it is not narrowly tailored to remedy the specific action which gives rise to the order as determined by the substantive law at issue”
• concluding an injunction “is overbroad if it is not narrowly tailored to remedy the specific action which gives rise to the order as determined by the substantive law at issue” (cleaned up)
• concluding an injunction “is overbroad if it is not narrowly tailored to remedy the specific action which gives rise to the order as determined by the substantive law at issue” (cleaned up)
• vacating injunction because it failed to “state its terms specifically and describe in reasonable detail the conduct restrained or required” (quoting Daniels Health Scis., L.L.C. v. Vascular Health Scis., L.L.C., 710 F.3d 579, 586 (5th Cir. 2013))
• quot- ing Schmidt v. Lessard, 414 U.S. 473, 476 (1974)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).