State of Iowa v. Alfonso D. Faison Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Hearing Committee’s conclusion that respondent “seemed honest” because there was “no factual support in the record” for the Hearing Committee’s credibility conclusion and other evidence directly contradicted it
• “[T]he Hearing Committee’s conduct was not deliberate because the Hearing Committee’s contrary finding was supported by substantial evidence and was thus owed deference
• “[W]e generally defer to credibility determinations made by Hearing Committee members who are in a better position than either the Board or this court to assess the truthfulness of witness testimony.”
• false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor
• false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor
• false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).