State of Indiana v. Jennifer Diane Lucas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relevant conduct in a joint criminal activity includes “all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity”
• “[WJhere two individuals agree to commit an offense, each becomes liable for actions taken by the other in furtherance of that particular crime.” (emphasis omitted)
• “[A] conspiracy can be inferred from a combination of close relationships or knowing presence and other supporting circumstantial evidence.”
• “[W]here as here the relevant conduct issue involves not only a factual question, but ‘the district court’s application of the guidelines to the facts,’ the proper standard is due deference—one between clear error and de novo review.” (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3742
• reversing on due deference review for legal error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).