Skip to main content
· 4/24/2013

State of Indiana v. Darrell Keck

Citations

  • 986 N.E.2d 847
  • 2013 WL 1755482
  • 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the trial court heard evidence that could support a conclusion Keck’s compliance with Ind. Code § 9-21-8-2(a) was not possible under the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.