· 4/24/2013
State of Indiana v. Darrell Keck
Citations
- 986 N.E.2d 847
- 2013 WL 1755482
- 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the trial court heard evidence that could support a conclusion Keck’s compliance with Ind. Code § 9-21-8-2(a) was not possible under the circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.