State of Indiana v. Braeden Terrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it was “questionable” whether a separate Litchfield analysis is required in considering the reasonableness of probation searches in light of Vanderkolk holding
• holding search Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 18A-CR-2317 | August 16, 2019 Page 15 of 30 of probationer’s nightstand did not violate the Indiana Constitution when probationer waived his search and seizure rights as condition of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).