State of Indiana ex rel. Richard M. Allen v. Carroll Circuit Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is axiomatic in trademark law that the standard test of ownership is priority of use.\
• efforts to sell trademark during several years of nonuse defeat inference of intent to abandon mark
• “As long as ... the [new] owner intends to use [the mark] in connection with substantially the same business or service, the public is not deceived.”
• under New York law, “the courts require that the possessor of a trade secret take reasonable measures to protect its secrecy”
• “As long as the mark has significant remaining value and the owner intends to use it in connection with substantially the same business or service, the public is not deceived”
• “As long as the mark has significant remaining value and the owner intends to use it in connection with substantially the same business or service, the public is not deceived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).