State of Illinois v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Section 2 forbids not the intentional pursuit of monopoly power but the employment of unjustifiable means to gain that power.”
• “The [Supreme] Court’s interpretation of the cost-plus exception appears so narrow.. .as to preclude its application in any case....”
• \ Section 2 forbids not the intentional pursuit of monopoly power but the employment of unjustifiable means to gain that power.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).