STATE OF FLORIDA v. TONY DEVONNE HALL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when due” clause was not implicated where plaintiff “could have waited forever and still would have been ineligible to receive benefits”
• re- viewing question of statutory and constitutional interpreta- tions de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).