State of Florida v. Shawnest Angelo Ivey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that drivers are required to stop for police officers and that, as a result, “a traffic stop by its nature is not an ordinary police-citizen ‘encounter,’ as the court described such encounters in Holmes”
• noting that evidence derived from questioning that occurs during an unlawfully extended stop is subject to suppression
• holding evidence obtained when police exceed statutory authority not suppressible unless it violates a constitutional rule
• holding evidence obtained when police exceed statutory authority not suppressible unless it violates a constitutional rule
• explaining that the officers’ questions in both cases extended the stops because their questions occurred after the traffic stops had been completed, were unrelated to the stop, and were not independently justified
• explaining that the officers’ questions in both cases extended the stops because their questions occurred after the traffic stops had been completed, were unrelated to the stop, and were not inde- pendently justified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).