State of Florida v. Joseph E. Simanonok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing when member of the armed forces may remove a state crim- inal proceeding under § 1442a
• “Clearly, the party seeking removal [under 28 U.S.C. § 1442a] must also be a member of the armed forces.” (emphasis added)
• “Clearly, the party seeking removal [under 28 U.S.C. § 1442a] must also be a member of the armed forces.” (emphasis added)
• The defendant based removal on 28 U.S.C. § 1442a, but the Eleventh Circuit used a color of office analysis from Maryland v. Soper (No. 1), 270 U.S. 9 (1926), which is a case arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).