State of Florida v. Jenifer Perera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of appellant’s motion challenging DOC’s misapplication of -6- J-S07040-24 sentencing order provision of credit for time served, where appellant did not allege that the sentencing order was illegal or ambiguous
• affirming the trial court’s order denying relief on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction, where “the claim -6- J-S25039-25 raised by Wheeler in his motion to the trial court challenge[d] the [DOC’s] application of his credit for time served”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).