STATE OF FLORIDA v. I.J., A CHILD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of claims based on theory that ERISA imposed duty to disclose adverse information about employer’s business
• finding appropriate the dismissal of co-fiduciary liability and duty-to-monitor claims when underlying duty-of-loyalty claim was without merit
• “We find that a prudent fiduciary . . . could readily conclude that it would do more harm than good to disclose information . . . prior to the conclusion of the government’s investigation.”
• “[W]e find Appellants’ allegation based on general economic principles—that the longer a fraud is concealed, the greater the harm to the company’s reputation and stock price—is too generic to meet the requisite pleading standard.”
• considering general economic principles as “part of the overall picture”
• “we find Appellants’ allegation based on general economic principles -- that the longer a fraud is concealed, the greater the harm to the greater the harm to the company's reputation and stock price -- is too generic to meet the requisite pleading standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).