State of Florida v. Deontae Palinski Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• portions of statement sought to be introduced must qualify, explain, contradict, or put into context segments previously introduced
• argument that where more than one-third of jury venire had been prejudiced it was impossible to empanel impartial jury has no merit
• statements made by defendant shortly after he sustained gunshot wound to head were voluntary, given evidence that he had * been \alert and oriented\
• statement to police voluntary although defendant was suffering from newly received gunshot wounds to head and arm
• despite “massive publicity,” denial of change of venue not error where each juror questioned in individual voir dire on impartiality
• \alert and oriented\ defendant's statements to police voluntary despite recovering from gunshot wound to his head and arm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).