STATE OF FLORIDA v. DARREN ROBERT EARL CRITTENDEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that officials may make at least a single inference to fill a gap in an affidavit
• observing that good faith may be found where review “turn[s] up some modicum of evidence, however slight, to connect the criminal activity described in the affidavit to the place to be searched”
• requiring only “some modicum of evidence, however slight, to connect the criminal activity . . . to the place to be searched”
• finding no good-faith where nexus could only be established by “inferences drawn upon inferences”
• “No reasonable officer could have believed that the affidavit was not so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to be reliable.”
• “No reasonable officer could have believed that the affidavit was not so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to be reliable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).