Skip to main content
· 1/17/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 104 F.3d 1507
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 420
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20508
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 673
  • 144 A.L.R. Fed. 669
  • 43 ERC (BNA) 1946
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that although the party seeking reassignment for judicial bias had not properly raised the issue below, the court could nonetheless reassign by invoking its supervisory authority
  • providing the standard for when the Ninth Circuit will reassign a case; internal quotation marks omitted
  • “If the plain meaning of the statute only supports one interpretation, the statute is not ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.