State of California, Ex Rel., State Land Commission v. Yuba Goldfields, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the United States’ clear interest [was] evidenced by the existence of quitclaim deeds,” which “constituted a cloud on California’s title”
• finding that 6 recording of quitclaim deeds triggered running of statute of 7 limitations
• “Neither the language of the statute nor the legislative history of the Act requires a showing of adversity_”
• \Neither the language of the statute nor the legislative history of the Act requires a showing of adversity....\
• QTA’s twelve-year period begins to run when parties first become aware that the United States may assert a claim to lands they are claiming
• “[W]e rely on the precise wording of the [QTA]’s text to determine when a cause of action accrues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).