Skip to main content
· 7/10/1986

State of California Board of Equalization v. Ulrich (In Re Solari)

Citations

  • 63 B.R. 115
  • 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an amended proof of claim’s relation back because it “does not purport to cure a defect in the timely filed claim, nor does it describe the [original] claim with greater particularity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashland, Elliott, Vol-Inn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.