State of Arizona v. Hon. Jeffrey T. Bergin, Hon. Danielle Liwski Remington
Citations
- 541 P.3d 587
Syllabus
Whether the respondent judge erred in concluding he had authority to order the preparation and disclosure of a grand jury transcript to real party in interest Ryan Remington, when the grand jury returned a no bill. And, assuming such authority exists, whether the respondent erred in concluding Remington had made the required showing to justify the order.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No conviction or criminal charge should be included in the report, or considered by the court, unless referable to an official record.”
- wherein defendant was to be advised of all adverse information in pre-sentence report.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.