State of Arizona v. Hon. bernstein/herman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when the reliability of an expert’s opinion is a close question, the court should allow the jury to exercise its fact-finding function in fact-the weight and credibility of the evidence
• explaining that the superior court should “allow the jury to exercise its fact-finding function, for it is the jury’s exclusive province to assess the weight and credibility of evidence”
• noting the adversarial system allows the opposing party to question the reliability and application of an expert's experience and knowledge
• noting the adversarial system allows the opposing party to question the reliability and application of an expert's experience and knowledge
• “The overall purpose of Rule 702 . . . is simply to ensure that a fact-finder is presented with reliable and relevant evidence, not flawless evidence.”
• “The overall purpose of Rule 702 . . . is simply to ensure that a fact-finder is presented with reliable and relevant evidence, not flawless evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).