State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining conviction if it is supported by substantial evidence, which may be direct or circumstantial and which is adequate enough for a reasonable person to conclude defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• “[Section] 13-1904(A)(1) does not require the use or threatened use of the weapon, only that a defendant is ‘armed with a deadly weapon’ during the commission of the crime.”
• “[Section] 13-1904(A)(1) does not require the use or threatened use of the weapon, only that a defendant is ‘armed with a deadly weapon’ during the commission of the crime.”
• “[Section] 13-1904(A)(1) does not require the use or threatened use of the weapon, only that a defendant is ‘armed with a deadly weapon’ during the commission of the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).