State of Arizona v. Cynthia D. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the only witness who could contradict defendant’s exculpatory trial testimony instead supported her testimony
• ARS § 13-2512 is “the statutory embodiment of the distinct, independent, common-law offense of being an accessory after the fact.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• An accomplice is different from an accessory after the fact because “[t]o be an accomplice, a person’s first connection with a crime must be prior to, or during, its commission; it cannot be after the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).