State of Alaska v. Brennan Adam Grubb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “occasional, unsolicited sales of tournament tickets and merchandise to California residents” and maintenance- of a small number of license agreements with California vendors was insufficient to support general jurisdiction
• concluding that defendant’s license agreements with two television networks and a handful of California vendors constituted doing business with California and not in California
• holding that Calder “cannot stand for the broad proposition that a foreign act with foreseeable effects in the forum state always gives rise to specific jurisdiction”
• concluding that defendant expressly aimed at plaintiff in California by sending a letter to Virginia with the alleged intent and result of disrupting the plaintiffs California business
• holding that a company that “continues to have license agreements with two television networks and a handful of California vendors” was “doing business with California, but ... not ... doing business in California”
• holding that “occasional, unsolicited sales of tournament tickets and merchandise to California residents are insufficient to create general jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).