State Nat. Bank v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ATS claims against defendants residing in the United States were barred because all conduct relevant to claims “occurred on foreign soil”
• collecting cases and noting that a few courts “have sustained ATS claims ... where at least some — if not a substantial portion — of the relevant conduct occurred domestically”
• dismissing ATS claims because all relevant action took place in Bolivia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).