State Nat. Bank of Mt. Pleasant v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting appellate court review is limited to the evidence, theories, and arguments presented to the trial court
• “[W]e have rejected the contention that a judgment is or is not final if the trial court and/or parties intended it to be. The issue is not intent, but rather whether it is final under Rule 54(a)(1) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).